WWhichAITry via Vercel AI Gateway
Compare/head-to-head

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Qwen 3 Max

Anthropic's flagship. Deep reasoning, long-horizon agents. Meanwhile, qwen 3 max: alibaba's flagship. top-tier multilingual and coding.

Side-by-side

Specs

DimensionClaude Opus 4.7Qwen 3 Max
Provider
Anthropic
Alibaba
Released
2026-02
2025-10
Context window
1M
256K
Output max
64K
32K
Input /M
$15.00
$1.20
Output /M
$75.00
$4.00
Modalities
text, image
text, image
Open weights
no
no
Scorecard

Dimension-by-dimension

Claude Opus 4.7
Qwen 3 Max
reasoning
10.0
8.0
coding
10.0
9.0
writing
9.0
8.0
speed
5.0
7.0
value
6.0
9.0
Verdict

Which wins, by use case

Use caseWinnerWhy
codingClaude Opus 4.7a coin flip on our weighted coding score
writingClaude Opus 4.7a coin flip on our weighted writing score
chatQwen 3 Maxa decisive lead on our weighted chat score
agentsClaude Opus 4.7a clear edge on our weighted agents score
summarizationQwen 3 Maxa decisive lead on our weighted summarization score
translationQwen 3 Maxa clear edge on our weighted translation score
reasoningClaude Opus 4.7a decisive lead on our weighted reasoning score
researchClaude Opus 4.7a coin flip on our weighted research score
vision and multimodalClaude Opus 4.7a coin flip on our weighted vision score
Cheapest AI models for bulk workloadsQwen 3 Maxa decisive lead on our weighted cheap-bulk score
Bottom line

Our take

Pick Claude Opus 4.7 if you need: best-in-class agentic tool use, extended thinking for complex problems.

Pick Qwen 3 Max if you need: multilingual leader, strong coding.

At a 500M-input / 150M-output monthly volume, Claude Opus 4.7 costs roughly $18750 vs Qwen 3 Max at $1200. Use our calculator to plug in your own numbers.

Keep browsing

Other comparisons