DeepSeek V3 vs Llama 4 70B
Open-weights reasoning at bargain pricing. Meanwhile, llama 4 70b: mid-size open model. excellent price-performance when self-hosted.
Side-by-side
Specs
| Dimension | DeepSeek V3 | Llama 4 70B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Meta |
| Released | 2025-05 | 2025-07 |
| Context window | 128K | 128K |
| Output max | 8K | 8K |
| Input /M | ✓$0.27 | $0.60 |
| Output /M | $1.10 | ✓$0.60 |
| Modalities | text | text |
| Open weights | yes | yes |
Scorecard
Dimension-by-dimension
DeepSeek V3
Llama 4 70B
reasoning
9.0
7.0
coding
9.0
7.0
writing
7.0
7.0
speed
7.0
8.0
value
10.0
9.0
Verdict
Which wins, by use case
| Use case | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| coding | DeepSeek V3 | a decisive lead on our weighted coding score |
| writing | DeepSeek V3 | a coin flip on our weighted writing score |
| chat | DeepSeek V3 | a coin flip on our weighted chat score |
| agents | DeepSeek V3 | a decisive lead on our weighted agents score |
| summarization | DeepSeek V3 | a coin flip on our weighted summarization score |
| translation | DeepSeek V3 | a coin flip on our weighted translation score |
| reasoning | DeepSeek V3 | a decisive lead on our weighted reasoning score |
| research | DeepSeek V3 | a clear edge on our weighted research score |
| vision and multimodal | DeepSeek V3 | a clear edge on our weighted vision score |
| Cheapest AI models for bulk workloads | DeepSeek V3 | a coin flip on our weighted cheap-bulk score |
Bottom line
Our take
Pick DeepSeek V3 if you need: strong math & code, very cheap.
Pick Llama 4 70B if you need: open weights, cheap on hosted providers.
At a 500M-input / 150M-output monthly volume, DeepSeek V3 costs roughly $300 vs Llama 4 70B at $390. Use our calculator to plug in your own numbers.
Keep browsing