WWhichAITry via Vercel AI Gateway
Compare/head-to-head

Gemini 3 Flash vs Qwen 3 Coder

Cheap, fast, 2M-token context. Meanwhile, qwen 3 coder: open-weights coding specialist.

Side-by-side

Specs

DimensionGemini 3 FlashQwen 3 Coder
Provider
Google
Alibaba
Released
2026-01
2025-10
Context window
2M
128K
Output max
32K
16K
Input /M
$0.30
$0.50
Output /M
$1.20
$1.50
Modalities
text, image, audio, video
text
Open weights
no
yes
Scorecard

Dimension-by-dimension

Gemini 3 Flash
Qwen 3 Coder
reasoning
7.0
7.0
coding
7.0
9.0
writing
7.0
6.0
speed
10.0
8.0
value
10.0
10.0
Verdict

Which wins, by use case

Use caseWinnerWhy
codingQwen 3 Codera clear edge on our weighted coding score
writingGemini 3 Flasha coin flip on our weighted writing score
chatGemini 3 Flasha clear edge on our weighted chat score
agentsQwen 3 Codera coin flip on our weighted agents score
summarizationGemini 3 Flasha clear edge on our weighted summarization score
translationGemini 3 Flasha clear edge on our weighted translation score
reasoningQwen 3 Codera coin flip on our weighted reasoning score
researchGemini 3 Flasha coin flip on our weighted research score
vision and multimodalGemini 3 Flasha coin flip on our weighted vision score
Cheapest AI models for bulk workloadsGemini 3 Flasha clear edge on our weighted cheap-bulk score
Bottom line

Our take

Pick Gemini 3 Flash if you need: unbeatable cost for the context window, very fast.

Pick Qwen 3 Coder if you need: coding-tuned, open weights.

At a 500M-input / 150M-output monthly volume, Gemini 3 Flash costs roughly $330 vs Qwen 3 Coder at $475. Use our calculator to plug in your own numbers.

Keep browsing

Other comparisons